Studies in Linguistic Meanings (Pragmatics, 2017, Semantics 2017)

Tahun Akademik:
Gasal 2020/2021
Kelas-Offr:
GH-GH
Deskripsi:

This course provides information on issues to do with pragmatics that is dynamically related to and is applicable in
real life situations. It deals with (un)intentional manipulation of social norms in real time spoken and written
discourse. General topics include development in speech act theory, conversational maxims, relevant implicature,
communicative events, and activity types: cognitive theory, scripts, schemata, frames, presupposition and mutual
knowledge, the pragmatics of politeness, power, ideology and critical discourse analysis, contrastive pragmatics,
and the development of pragmatic competence in normal disordered context. The course allows students to
explore the aforementioned topics and work on mini research projects both individually and groups, employing ICT
and all resources available under the supervision of the course instructor.


Capaian Pembelajaran

  • 1. Distinguish and evaluate the importance between teaching and learning pragmatics

  • 2. Identify the concepts of how we choose what to say and how we can’t choose what to say

  • 3. Distinguish and evaluate the concepts of both linguistic contexts and situational contexts

  • 4. Analyze and relate the concepts of pragmatics with either written or spoken corpus data.

  • 5. Compose an infographics report for the result of their analysis on corpus data.

Daftar Pustaka:

  • Recommended Readings:
    Crystal, D. (2006). How language works. London: Clays Ltd, St Ives plc.

  • Fromkin, V., Blair, D., & Collins, P. (1999). An introduction to language: Fourth edition. New South Wales:
    Southwood Press Pty Limited.

  • Articles:
    Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Mahan-Taylor, R. (2003). Introduction to teaching pragmatics. English Teaching Forum.

  • Brock, M.N., & Nagasaka, Y. (2005). Teaching pragmatics in the EFL classroom? SURE you can!. TESL Reporter,
    38(1), 17-26.

  • Conrad, S. (2002). Corpus linguistic approaches for discourse analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 75-
    95.


  • Crible, L. & Cuenca, M.J. (2017). Discourse markers in speech: Characteristics and challenges for corpus annotation.
    Dialogue and Discourse, 8(2), 149-166)

  • Hyland, K. (1996). Talking to the academy: Forms of hedging in science research articles. Written Communiction,
    13(2), 251 – 281.

  • Yannuar, N., Shitadevi, I.A., Basthomi, Y., & Widiati, U. (2014). Active and passive voice constructions by Indonesian
    student writers. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(7), 1400 – 1408.